My colleagues know when we began this new session off Congress, we enacted a new Rule 12, Section 7, Subsection 5C1, that requires that all enrolled bills have a statement attached that states the constitutional authority under which the bill may be considered. And I can read from Subsection (5) C1: ‘Record a statement, citing as specifically as practical, the powers granted to Congress in the Constitution to enact the bill.’
When this bill [the ‘Right To Life’ Act, HR 358] was enrolled on January 20, 2011, that statement… (it failed) to do so. As such this bill has not been duly enrolled. I ask that it not be considered today, and that the remedy be that it be re-introduced with a proper statement, and that the bill be considered at that time.
The language that was included in the record reads as follows: … the Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant to the following: ‘The Protect Life Act,’ which apparently is the short title for this — would overturn a unconstitutional mandate requiring abortion in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
Unlike every other bill that has been introduced in this session of Congress by Democrats and Republicans alike, no section of the Constitution is stated, no subsection, no constitutional authority whatsoever. It’s as if someone said, ‘We’re not going to be considering a bill because we don’t like it or we don’t think its constitutional.
The requirement of the rule is clear: it says it has to, to enact a bill, the power granted to the Congress in the Constitution (must be cited) — none of this language refers to that — and I make this point of order for two reasons: one is, I think we should follow the rules, I think this is our first day, and I like that section that the Republican majority insisted upon. I think we should always think about the constitutional underpinnings of what we do.
Secondly… there is a serious question where, if push came to shove, you’d have the ability to point to where it is in the Constitution you could take a woman’s right away — where you have to be able to say where, under the Fourth Amendment, you have the right the to deny the right of privacy to half of the population of our country. And for those reasons, I insist upon my point of order and the remedy that the bill be not considered on this day.
New York Democratic representative ANTHONY WEINER, challenging Republicans to follow their own rules requiring bills to include a statement attesting to the constitutionality of a proposed law — which they can’t in this case, because restricting abortions violates the Constitution!!!
But they just ignore shit like that, because they’re fucking Republicans, and they can’t be bothered with things like Supreme Court rulings.
And oh yeah — Frank Pallone (D - NJ)? He kicked ass in his follow-up, too.
Weiner gets the auto-reblog. Love him.
(via christianjoseph)
Reading this makes me feel better.
(via telegantmess)
I love Weiner.
(Source: inothernews)
Notes:
-
truthfulxlies reblogged this from fuckyeahanthonyweiner
-
thesupermarketwino reblogged this from missgingerlee
-
chrisorourke liked this
-
ianbrooks liked this
-
bitofarumbl reblogged this from emandink
-
bitofarumbl liked this
-
calefaction reblogged this from emandink
-
emandink reblogged this from telegantmess
-
telegantmess reblogged this from lucypaw and added:
Reading this makes me feel better.
-
christinathena reblogged this from alexbeaver
-
katie-stanton reblogged this from inothernews
-
jumblejo reblogged this from inothernews
-
rawwwrrrr reblogged this from inothernews
-
mar-see-ah liked this
-
fuckyeahanthonyweiner reblogged this from inothernews
-
resmc liked this
-
kasperthesardonicghost reblogged this from inothernews
-
takeabetterlook liked this
-
simplyjoshua liked this
-
jennhoney liked this
-
demons liked this
-
himynameisbrett liked this
-
thisistheglamorous liked this
-
thoseareturkeys reblogged this from inothernews
-
soundtrackofdemocracy reblogged this from subjectiveorealities
-
bsig liked this
-
randomactsofchaos liked this
-
drmeowmix liked this
-
alexbeaver reblogged this from lucypaw
-
heksenhaus liked this
-
danholepond liked this
-
lucypaw reblogged this from bohemianarthouse
-
danholepond reblogged this from other-stuff
-
bamwashington liked this
-
sakanarochan liked this
-
other-stuff reblogged this from purplegem
-
leahsworoglian liked this
-
subjectiveorealities reblogged this from inothernews and added:
And yes Congressman Pallone is from NJ-06. My hero Congressman Weiner…
-
subjectiveorealities liked this
-
purplegem reblogged this from inothernews
-
bluntlyblue reblogged this from inothernews
-
the-communist-daughter liked this
-
shitiwouldeat liked this
-
littlewars liked this
-
dammitjean liked this
-
kquizzo liked this
-
meganegginclegg liked this
-
apatosaurus liked this
-
yourenotaloneinthis reblogged this from inothernews
- Show more notes